. . . the most tangential clues could become brutally relevant.
- Annie Ernaux
Your feeble metric yielded far too many false positives.
Really? Just how many are far too many?
And the straight line from x to y was returned unopened.
Of course, the semioticians were all ears.
I had a great time, but then, night fell.
Slow down, I'm trying to take notes.
Click Automatic Writing
and you'll be sailing away with your own true love.
Dylan, yes?
It doesn't jibe well with the course (select one):
a. You signed up for
b. You set for yourself.
Stop, already, with the parenthetical stuff.
Please, continue:
OK, we drove through darkness; she wearing glasses.
I was having a conversation with myself.
We ended up sitting on the floor, discussing facades.
And this was good, yes?
I remember her eyes, scanning the lines to the next scene.
I pulled out a three-ring binder
and began jotting down images.
Regrets climbed into my pockets.
For what?
Skipping ahead, channel surfing, the deck's changing milieu.
More hair splitting!
Not in a bad way, though.
Some, by the way, have been bronzed.
I tried to categorize incidentals despite their squirming.
Tell me, do you enjoy being categorized?
I'm sorry, but it's a kneejerk.
And then?
I dropped out, along with those memorializing the moment.
Aleksandr Rodchenko |